- For Students
- For Faculty
- Interlibrary Loan
- Request an Item from Everett Library
- Study Rooms & Labs
- Archives & Special Collections
- Accessibility Guide
- Citing Your Sources
- Off-Campus Access
- Online Tutorials
- Library 101
- Library Staff
- Library Hours
- Library Diversity Statement
- Friends of the Library
- History of Everett Library
- Give to the Library
- Library Mission & Vision
- Library Policies
- Nursing Databases
- EBP - Evidence Based Practice and PICO
- Journal Search
- Nursing Websites
- APA Tutorial
- Video Tutorials
- Digital Literacy Sites
Articles from Ovid Database
- Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health
- Link to Nursing Research (journal) This journal includes nursing research and has some quantitative studies.
- AJN, American Journal of Nursing
- Increasing Access to Diabetes Education in Rural Alabama Through Telehealth
- Evaluating the Impact of Smartphones on Nursing Workflow: Lessons Learned
- Validity of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment Screener in Adolescents and Young Adults With and Without Congenital Heart Disease
- Pharmacogenetics of Ketamine-Induced Emergence Phenomena
- Pressure Pain Phenotypes in Women Before Breast Cancer Treatmen
- Efficacy of a Breastfeeding Pain SelfManagement Intervention: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Tria
- Stress and Health in Nursing Students The Nurse Engagement and Wellness Study
- The Efficacy and Safety of an RN-Driven Ketamine Protocol for Adjunctive Analgesia During Burn Wound Care
- Potassium Channel Candidate Genes Predict the Development of Secondary Lymphedema Following Breast Cancer Surgery
- Social Support Is Inversely Associated With Sleep Disturbance, Inflammation, and Pain Severity in Chronic Low Back Pain.
- Effect of a Nurse-Led Community Health Worker Intervention on Latent Tuberculosis Medication Completion Among Homeless Adults
- Poor Sleep Predicts Increased Pain Perception Among Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment
- Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Effects of “Mindful Moms” A Mindful Physical Activity Intervention for Pregnant Women with Depression
- Associations Among Nitric Oxide and Enkephalinases With Fibromyalgia Symptoms
- Prescribed Walking for Glycemic Control and Symptom Management in Patients Without Diabetes Undergoing Chemotherapy
- Dysmenorrhea Symptom-Based Phenotypes A Replication and Extension Study
- Influence of Oxidative Stress-Related Genes on Susceptibility to Fibromyalgia
- ABNF journal link
- Cardiovascular Diseases in African-American Women: An Assessment of Awareness
- Document links
- << Previous: Digital Literacy Sites
- Last Updated: Sep 16, 2022 1:59 PM
- URL: https://library.queens.edu/nursing
An official website of the United States government
The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.
The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.
- Account settings
- My Bibliography
- Citation manager
Save citation to file
Email citation, add to collections.
- Create a new collection
- Add to an existing collection
Add to My Bibliography
Your saved search, create a file for external citation management software, your rss feed.
- Search in PubMed
- Search in NLM Catalog
- Add to Search
A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation
- 1 West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
- PMID: 24606553
- DOI: 10.1111/jocn.12575
Aims and objectives: To quantify quantitative outcomes of a practice change to a blended form of bedside nursing report.
Background: The literature identifies several benefits of bedside nursing shift report. However, published studies have not adequately quantified outcomes related to this process change, having either small or unreported sample sizes or not testing for statistical significance.
Design: Quasi-experimental pre- and postimplementation design.
Methods: Seven medical-surgical units in a large university hospital implemented a blend of recorded and bedside nursing report. Outcomes monitored included patient and nursing satisfaction, patient falls, nursing overtime and medication errors.
Results: We found statistically significant improvements postimplementation in four patient survey items specifically impacted by the change to bedside report. Nursing perceptions of report were significantly improved in the areas of patient safety and involvement in care and nurse accountability postimplementation. However, there was a decline in nurse perception that report took a reasonable amount of time after bedside report implementation; contrary to these perceptions, there was no significant increase in nurse overtime. Patient falls at shift change decreased substantially after the implementation of bedside report. An intervening variable during the study period invalidated the comparison of medication errors pre- and postintervention. There was some indication from both patients and nurses that bedside report was not always consistently implemented.
Conclusions: Several positive outcomes were documented in relation to the implementation of a blended bedside shift report, with few drawbacks. Nurse attitudes about report at the final data collection were more positive than at the initial postimplementation data collection.
Relevance to clinical practice: If properly implemented, nursing bedside report can result in improved patient and nursing satisfaction and patient safety outcomes. However, managers should involve staff nurses in the implementation process and continue to monitor consistency in report format as well as satisfaction with the process.
Keywords: bedside shift report; nursing handover; nursing shift report; patient satisfaction; patient-centred care.
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
- Incorporating bedside report into nursing handoff: evaluation of change in practice. Sand-Jecklin K, Sherman J. Sand-Jecklin K, et al. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013 Apr-Jun;28(2):186-94. doi: 10.1097/NCQ.0b013e31827a4795. J Nurs Care Qual. 2013. PMID: 23169250
- Hardwiring Bedside Shift Report. Scheidenhelm S, Reitz OE. Scheidenhelm S, et al. J Nurs Adm. 2017 Mar;47(3):147-153. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000457. J Nurs Adm. 2017. PMID: 28157819
- Adopting a patient-centred approach: an investigation into the introduction of bedside handover to three rural hospitals. Bradley S, Mott S. Bradley S, et al. J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jul;23(13-14):1927-36. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12403. Epub 2013 Oct 24. J Clin Nurs. 2014. PMID: 24164249
- Leading Change in Nurse Bedside Shift Report. Clark A, Wolgast KA, Mazur N, Mekis A. Clark A, et al. Nurs Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;55(1):21-28. doi: 10.1016/j.cnur.2019.10.002. Epub 2019 Dec 16. Nurs Clin North Am. 2020. PMID: 32005362 Review.
- The secrets to successful nurse bedside shift report implementation and sustainability. Dorvil B. Dorvil B. Nurs Manage. 2018 Jun;49(6):20-25. doi: 10.1097/01.NUMA.0000533770.12758.44. Nurs Manage. 2018. PMID: 29750777 Free PMC article. Review.
- Influencing Factors of Nurses' Practice during the Bedside Handover: A Qualitative Evidence Synthesis Protocol. Cruchinho P, Teixeira G, Lucas P, Gaspar F. Cruchinho P, et al. J Pers Med. 2023 Jan 31;13(2):267. doi: 10.3390/jpm13020267. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 36836500 Free PMC article.
- Investigating nurses' perception of bedside handoff. Winebarger A. Winebarger A. Nursing. 2022 Sep 1;52(9):54-56. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000854012.26421.c0. Nursing. 2022. PMID: 36006754 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
- Development and psychometric testing of the patient participation in bedside handover survey. Tobiano G, Marshall AP, Gardiner T, Jenkinson K, Shapiro M, Ireland M. Tobiano G, et al. Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2492-2502. doi: 10.1111/hex.13569. Epub 2022 Jul 27. Health Expect. 2022. PMID: 35898173 Free PMC article.
- Patient safety culture and handoff evaluation of nurses in small and medium-sized hospitals. Kim JH, Lee JL, Kim EM. Kim JH, et al. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020 Dec 16;8(1):58-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2020.12.007. eCollection 2021 Jan 10. Int J Nurs Sci. 2020. PMID: 33575446 Free PMC article.
- Observations of nursing staff compliance to a checklist for person-centred handovers - a quality improvement project. Sharp L, Dahlén C, Bergenmar M. Sharp L, et al. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019 Dec;33(4):892-901. doi: 10.1111/scs.12686. Epub 2019 Apr 8. Scand J Caring Sci. 2019. PMID: 30963604 Free PMC article.
- Search in MeSH
LinkOut - more resources
Full text sources.
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.
Other Literature Sources
- scite Smart Citations
- MedlinePlus Health Information
- Citation Manager
NCBI Literature Resources
MeSH PMC Bookshelf Disclaimer
The PubMed wordmark and PubMed logo are registered trademarks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited.
Most Popular Articles : Nursing Research
- Subscribe to journal Subscribe
- Get new issue alerts Get alerts
Most Popular Articles
Stress and health in nursing students: the nurse engagement and wellness study.
Nursing Research. 68(6):453-463, November/December 2019.
- Abstract Abstract
Go to Full Text of this Article
Nursing Research. 71(2):164-174, March/April 2022.
Shifting Paradigms in Nursing Science
Nursing Research. 71(1):1-2, January/February 2022.
A Meta-Analysis of Breastfeeding Effects for Infants With Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Nursing Research. 71(1):54-65, January/February 2022.
Factors Associated With Quality of Life Among People Living With a Stoma in Nonmetropolitan Areas
Nursing Research. 70(4):281-288, July/August 2021.
Honoring the Past, Pursuing the Future
Nursing Research. 67(1):1-2, January/February 2018.
The Fundamentals of Care Framework as a Point-of-Care Nursing Theory
Nursing Research. 67(2):99-107, March/April 2018.
Key Issues in Nursing Theory: Developments, Challenges, and Future Directions
Nursing Research. 67(2):81-92, March/April 2018.
Experiences With COVID-19
Nursing Research. 71(3):E21-E27, May/June 2022.
The Nursing Student Self-Efficacy Scale: Development Using Item Response Theory
Nursing Research. 61(3):149-158, May/June 2012.
Health Communication Research for Nursing Science and Practice
Nursing Research. 65(4):257-258, July/August 2016.
Facilitators and Barriers to Minority Blood Donations: A Systematic Review
Nursing Research. 68(3):218-226, May/June 2019.
Alcohol or Drug Use and Trauma Recidivism
Nursing Research. 66(5):399-404, September/October 2017.
What Bed Size Does a Patient Need? The Relationship Between Body Mass Index and Space Required to Turn in Bed
Nursing Research. 66(6):483-489, November/December 2017.
Work Environment and Operational Failures Associated With Nurse Outcomes, Patient Safety, and Patient Satisfaction
Nursing Research. 72(1):20-29, January/February 2023.
Adherence to a Hypoglycemia Protocol in Hospitalized Patients: A Retrospective Analysis
Nursing Research. 70(1):15-23, January/February 2021.
Nurse-Reported Staffing Guidelines and Exclusive Breast Milk Feeding
Nursing Research. 71(6):432-440, November/December 2022.
A Concept Development for the Symptom Science Model 2.0
Nursing Research. 71(6):E48-E60, November/December 2022.
Polychoric Correlation With Ordinal Data in Nursing Research
Nursing Research. 71(6):469-476, November/December 2022.
Leadership and Cultural Competence of Healthcare Professionals: A Social Network Analysis
Nursing Research. 64(3):200-210, May/June 2015.
Colleague's E-mail is Invalid
Your message has been successfully sent to your colleague.
Save my selection
- My UCalgary
- Class Schedule
- UCalgary Directory
- Continuing Education
- Active Living
- Academic Calendar
- UCalgary Maps
- Close Faculty Websites List Viewing: Faculty Websites
- Cumming School of Medicine
- Faculty of Arts
- Faculty of Graduate Studies
- Faculty of Kinesiology
- Faculty of Law
- Faculty of Nursing
- Faculty of Nursing (Qatar)
- Faculty of Science
- Faculty of Social Work
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine
- Haskayne School of Business
- School of Architecture, Planning and Landscape
- Schulich School of Engineering
- Werklund School of Education
- Future Students
- Direct entry from high-school
- Rural Community Route
- Indigenous Community Route
- Clinical Simulation Learning Centre
- Bachelor of Nursing program at Medicine Hat College
- Fees & Funding
- What will I study?
- Required Documentation
- NCLEX Results
- Men in Nursing
- Undergraduate and Graduate Programs Office
- Graduate Certificates
- Master of Nursing: Course-based (MN)
- Master of Nursing: Thesis-based (MN)
- Doctoral Program (PhD)
- Doctor of Nursing (DN)
- Indigenous Initiatives
- ii' taa'poh'to'p (UCalgary Indigenous Strategy)
- Mental Health & Wellness
- NP Mental Health & Wellness Clinic
- ASIST Suicide Prevention Training
- Mental Health & Wellness Engagement Committee
- Current Students
- Curriculum Overview
- Term 1 & 2 (Year One)
- Managing my program
- Student Handbook
- Academic Accommodation
- Policies & Procedures
- Nursing Uniforms
- Course Listing
- Education Verification
- Student life
- We've got your back
- Year One (YO) Nursing Students
- Undergraduate Nursing Society (UNS)
- Nursing Inclusivity Committee
- Peer Mentorship
- Volunteering and your co-curricular record
- Pinning Ceremony
- Power in Numbers
- Research for Students
- Dean's List
- Addiction and Mental Health
- Contemporary Topics in Aging
- Innovations in Teaching and Learning
- Leadership for Health System Transformation
- Healthcare Innovation and Design
- Oncology Nursing
- Palliative and End of Life Care
- Graduate Programs Student Handbook
- Course Progression
- Student Life
- Faculty of Grad Studies (FGS)
- Graduate Students' Association (GSA)
- Nursing Graduate Students Association (NGSA)
- Message from Associate Dean, Graduate Programs
- Undergraduate Peer Mentorship Committee
- Faculty of Nursing Indigenous Initiatives (FONII) on D2L
- Indigenous Resources
- Experts at a Glance
- Find an expert
- Research Chairs
- Postdoctoral Scholars
- Message from Associate Dean, Research
- Funding Opportunities
- External Grants
- Internal Grants
- RSO (Research Services Office) Funding Calendar
Nursing Research Office
- Submit Service Request
- Grant Applications
- Ethics & AHS Approval
- Participant Recruitment
- Data Collection
- Data Analysis
- Scholarly Writing
- Innovation, KT & Impact
- QI/PE or Research
- Project Management
- Awards & Recognition
- External Awards
- Internal Awards
- Teaching and Learning
- Teaching and Learning Team
- Associate Dean, Curriculum Development & Program Evaluation
- Assistant Dean, Faculty Development
- Technology Integrated Learning Team (TILT)
- Professional Development
- Professional Development Strategic Plan (2019-2022)
- Faculty Learning Communities (FLC)
- Professional Development Opportunities
- Professional Education Program (PEP) Microcredentials
- Taylor Institute for Teaching and Learning
- Mentorship Guide
- Academic Staff Certificate
- Formative Feedback for Teaching Development
- Learning and Instructional Design
- Teaching, Learning and Technology (Sharepoint)
- Undergraduate BN Curriculum
- Graduate Curriculum
- Curriculum Development and Innovation
- Teaching Learning and Technology (Sharepoint)
- Simulation Learning
- About our Simulation Centre
- Book a Tour
- Our Partners
- Technology & Equipment
- Discipline-based Education Research
- Canadian Nurses Foundation
- Alumni & Donors
- Get Involved
- Planning Reunions
- Grow Your Career
- UCalgary NurseNetwork
- 2020: Year of the Nurse and Midwife
- The Leader in All of Us Conference
- Marguerite Schumacher Memorial Alumni Lecture
- Breakfast Lecture Series
- Alumni Luncheon
- Alumni Weekend
- Finding Florence: A First Look at the New UCalgary Nursing
- Alumni Committee
- Alumni Awards
- Alumni Connections
- Benefits and Services
- Connect with us
- Giving to UCalgary Nursing
- UCalgary Giving Day
- Energize: The Campaign for Eyes High
- Become a Mentor
- Become a Mentee
- About NurseMentor
- News & Events
- Explore Nursing
- Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
- Contact NurseMentor
- Alumni History Book 1974-2019
- History Book 1969-2004
- Nursing 50 Years
- 50 Faces of Nursing
- About our Dean
- Leadership Team
- Community Advisory Council
- Strategic Plan
- Strategic Plan 2021-2024
- Research and Scholarship
- Quality and breadth of learning
- Community engagement
- Strategic Plan Archives
- Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
- Alumni History Book
- Report to Community
- Nursing Research
- Faculty and Postdoctoral Scholars
- Pursuit of Excellence Awards
- All News & Events
- Find People
- Full Directory
- All Teaching Faculty
- Support Staff
- Get Support
- Nursing Advancement Team (NAT)
- Quick Links
- Faculty and Staff Intranet
- Campus Maps and Room Finder
- Emergency Response
- UCalgary Libraries
- UCalgary Information Technologies (IT)
Quantitative Data Analysis
Resources for study design through to data analysis and dissemination
Statistical analysis of quantitative data requires first choosing an appropriate method . Following analysis, results are summarized and reported in tables, charts, and graphs for interpretation, discussion, and dissemination in papers, manuscripts, and/or presentations.
UCalgary's Data Science Advisory Unit is available to help with study design, statistical analysis, visualization, and interpreting results (fee may apply).
Types of data, descriptive statistics, hypothesis testing, sample size & power, interpreting results, reporting results.
Designing a study includes developing good research question(s), choosing an appropriate methodology, estimating sample size, selecting data collection tools, and creating an analysis plan.
UCalgary's Research Computing Services is available to help researchers with study design, interpretation of results, and writing up results for publication.
Research Questions & Study Design
Your study design is guided by the research question(s). For example, does your question start with “How?” or “Why?” If so, your questions might be better addressed using qualitative methods. If you are asking “What?”, “When?, “Where?” or “How much?” you could consider quantitative methodologies. You might even combine both into a mixed methods approach.
Example Study Designs
- Descriptive (case reports, case series, descriptive surveys)
- Observational/Analytic (cross-sectional, case-control, cohort, hybrid)
- Experimental/Intervention (randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental designs)
- Mixed Methods (quantitative and qualitative methodologies combined)
Sample Size & Power Calculations
Sample size calculations are a key part of a research study. Sample size calculations should be run for each of your main/primary outcomes so you know that your study won’t be underpowered for any of the questions you plan to address.
The sample size calculation depends on your hypothesis test, the significance level (usually set as 5%), and the power and results from your pilot study. There are many formulas available for different research situations.
Data Collection & Sampling
Another important part of study planning is selecting a sampling technique. How will you select your participants? Will it be a convenience sample? Random sample? Cluster sample? Snowball sample?
Your choice will depend on the research question(s) and study design. Note that different sampling methods have corresponding potential biases. For example, if your sample was a “convenience sample,” the results may not be generalizable or may be biased in other ways (e.g. selection bias).
The analysis plan is your road map for data management and analysis. Writing up an analysis plan is a great way to keep things on track.
Conducting a complete analysis of the data you have collected will enable you to:
- Answer your research question(s)
- Determine the impact of your work
- Have scientific validation of your work
Plans also help with timelines and standardizing analytic approaches (e.g. treatment of missing values, inclusion and exclusion criteria).
Data Entry, Coding, & Cleaning
Data will have to be entered, coded and checked, new variables created, etc., even when doing secondary data analyses.
Create a data dictionary containing all of your variables, any derived variables and notes about how you coded them. This is useful not only if you will be sharing the dataset with other, but for yourself (e.g., if you need to come back to the data after some time away). Keep in mind that data cleaning is a process that will likely involve you revisiting the data several times over.
Primary data : data that you collect yourself from participants or health records using surveys, chart reviews, interviews, focus groups, etc.
Secondary data : data collected by other researchers that you are using to answer your own research questions
Qualitative vs. Quantitative Data
The type of data you collect depends on the question you want to answer and your resources. Both quantitative and qualitative data have strengths and limitations and may be appropriate for different settings, evaluation designs, and evaluation questions.
Qualitative data consist of words and narratives. The analysis of qualitative data can come in many forms including highlighting key words, extracting themes, and elaborating on concepts.
Quantitative data are numerical information, the analysis of which involves statistical techniques. The type of data you collect guides the analysis process.
Types of Variables
Dependent (Outcome) variables are the outcome of interest and will answer your research question(s).
Independent (Predictor) variables are those factors that may influence your dependent variable/outcome variable.
Example: Say you’re conducting a study on diet and exercise. Your weight would be your dependent variable and your diet and exercise (which both influence weight) would be your independent variables.
Categorical vs. Continuous Variables
Categorical variables are based on groupings or classification. There are two types: Nominal (no inherent order) and Ordinal (natural order).
Nominal Example – Smoker vs. Non-Smoker
Ordinal Example – Educational Level (Less than High School, High School, Some College, College, Bachelor’s Degree, Graduate Degree)
Continuous variables can take on any score or value within a measurement scale. There are two types: Interval and Ratio Scale . An interval variable can be ordered, and the distance or level between each category is equal and static. A ratio scale variable is similar to an interval variable with one difference: the ratio scale has true zero point (i.e., 0.0 = none/absence of the measurement).
Interval Example – Temperature
Ratio Scale Example – Weight
Descriptive statistics are commonly used to describe and explore quantitative datasets.
Before proceeding, you should assess the distribution of your data and consider variable transformations or non-parametric options, if necessary. It’s also a good idea to identify missing data and start thinking about how you might want to handle this (e.g. listwise deletion, imputation).
Common Descriptive Statistics
- Minimum (Min): lowest/smallest score in a data set
- Maximum (Max): highest/largest score in a data set
- Frequency : number of times a certain score appears in a data set
- Mean (Average): sum of all the scores divided by the number of scores
- Median : middle score of a data set after values ordered numerically; it divides the distribution in half
- Mode : most frequently occurring score in a data set
- Standard Deviation (SD): represents the average amount that a given score deviates from the mean score
Data and Normality
The goal of estimation and hypothesis testing is to generalize the results from a sample to the population. We need to determine whether a pattern we observe in the sample is due to chance or due to program or intervention effects.
Inferential analysis is used to determine if there is a relationship between an intervention or program and an outcome, as well as the strength of that relationship. The type of test selected for inferential analysis should be guided by the distribution of your data. Is it a normal or non-normal distribution?
A normal distribution looks like a Bell Curve (right).
Looking at your distribution, draw a curve over it that most closely fits your data. If your curve closely resembles the one in the image, your distribution is normal.
In a normal distribution the majority of the data is clustered around one number or value. If the data is normal, we usually choose a parametric statistical test for data analysis.
There are several reasons that a distribution may be non-normal. A small sample size or unusual sets of responses are common reasons that data may not be normally distributed. If the data is non-normal, we usually choose from a set of statistical tests called non-parametric statistical tests .
Non-normal data will have issues with skewness and/or kurtosis (below).
The graph shows negatively skewed data; the majority of the scores are at the higher end of possible scores. The curve has a longer curve to the left.
The graph shows positively skewed data; the majority of the scores are at the lower end of possible scores. The curve has a longer curve to the right.
This graph illustrates kurtosis, the spread or ‘peakedness’ of the distribution. A distribution can be too peaked or pointy.
Choosing a Statistical Test
Statistical tests allow us to make inferences about a sample because they can validate if the differences, associations, and patterns that we detect are real and not due to chance.
Selecting the appropriate test depends on the research design, the type of variable, and the distribution of the data.
If the data is normally distributed, you will choose a type of parametric test. If normality is violated, then you will need to use a test that doesn’t need the normality assumption to be valid. We call these non-parametric tests or parametric-independent tests.
SAGE Research provides an online tool to help you decide which test to choose.
Sample Size & Power
Sample size calculations should be run for each of your primary outcomes so that your study won't be underpowered for any of the research questions that you plan to address. *For surveys, Qualtrics has a sample size calculator .
Before calculating sample size, ask yourself:
1. Is my study descriptive or comparative ?
2. Is(are) the primary outcome variable(s) continuous or categorical ?
Use the Confidence Interval Approach
Use this approach to estimate your sample size when you want an interval around an estimate with a certain confidence level.
The population prevalence of hypertension among Canadians aged 20 to 79 was found to be significantly higher for men (24.5%, 95% CI : 22.7% to 26.4%) than for women (21.5%, 95% CI : 19.8% to 23.2%). Statistics Canada
Therefore, for men, point estimate is 24.5%, the margin of error is 1.9%.
Use the Hypothesis Testing Approach
Use this approach to estimate your sample size so that if such a difference exists, then findings would be statistically significant . The information you need to calculate a sample size will vary according to your study design, research questions, analysis plan and study restrictions. Prior to the calculation, you will need to decide on your:
Power . This is the ability of the statistical test to detect differences or effects that lead to rejection of the null hypothesis. It depends on the sample size. The larger the sample size, the bigger the power. It is important to calculate the sample size to have sufficient power before you begin your data collection. When your sample size is small, your study might not be able to detect the difference or effect, even when it is real, because of lack of power. Power is usually set at 80-90% power.
Level of significance (α). This is the pre-set level of error that you want to commit in your research, determined before your data collection. It is usually set at 0.05 or 0.01. P-value is the actual level of error found when you perform the statistical test. When p-value < α, then it supports the evidence against the null hypothesis (no effect) and your results are ‘statistically significant’.
In the results section you report on just the objective “facts and figures” of what you found. You then interpret these results in the discussion section .
1. Discuss the results in relation to each hypothesis
You have to report the results of your project or study in relation to your research questions/hypothesis. Present the results of the outcome variable(s) for each hypothesis.
2. Explain your results
Some guiding questions to consider when explaining your results:
- Do the results agree with the ideas that you introduced in your proposal?
- How do the results relate to previous literature or current theory?
- Discuss any of the limitations in the study design that may reduce the strength of your results.
3. Interpret p-values
Use descriptive language to indicate the strength of the evidence.
p-value , Description
< 0.001, Extremely significant ; Very strong evidence against the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative
0.001 – 0.010, Highly significant ; Strong evidence against the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative
0.011 – 0.050, Significant ; Moderate evidence against the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative
0.051 – 0.100, Not significant ; Weak evidence against the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative
> 0.100, No evidence ; No evidence against the null hypothesis
4. Generalize your results
This is where you explain the extent to which your study is externally valid . Discuss strengths and weaknesses of applying your results to, e.g., another population, species, age, or sex.
5. Propose a plan of action for future research
Based on your results, and considering the study's limitations, introduce new ideas or ways to improve the current area of research.
6. If your results were unexpected, discuss possible explanations
Try to identify and discuss factors or conditions that may have contributed to unexpected results. For example, site conditions (e.g., room temperature) could have been different between two focus group sessions.
7. Do not overstate the importance of your findings
Be careful about drawing erroneous conclusions. Report only actual findings and the relationships and associations between outcomes and predictor variables that have been confirmed with statistical evidence. For example, just because you find that two variables are related, you cannot automatically leap to the conclusion that those two variables have a cause-and-effect relationship.
8. Avoid speculating beyond the data
Refrain from generalizing your results to a larger group than was actually represented by your study. For example, results from a study involving nursing students may not be applicable to registered nurses.
9. Remain focused on the research question(s)
Resist the temptation to deviate or to make sweeping generalities based on your findings.
10. End the discussion on a positive note
Summarize the study’s strengths, conclusions, implications, and your suggestions for future research.
The Results section of your paper should only be used to report, not interpret, your findings. The Discussion section is where the interpretation and implications of your findings are presented.
The American Psychological Association ( APA ) style guide is most commonly used within the social sciences.
Best Practices for Reporting
1. Summarize succinctly.
The Results section is the shortest and most condensed section in a manuscript or thesis/dissertation, typically 1-2 pages. Present each of your variables in separate subsections, writing a brief summary for each.
2. Keep the 'Results' and 'Discussion' sections separate.
Statistical results are presented but are not discussed in the results section . Reserve your interpretation for the discussion section .
3. Provide the results separately for each hypotheses.
The Results section should describe how your data supports or refutes each hypothesis.
4. Include tables and figures.
Using tables and figures is a great way to summarize your results. Include descriptive statistics (such as means and standard deviations) and/or the results of any inferential statistics (test statistic, degrees of freedom, confidence intervals, and the p-value).
5. Be careful when drawing conclusions.
Draw appropriate conclusions from your findings. Do not overstate the importance of results and limit your conclusions to the population that is actually represented by your study.
Frequently Asked Questions
Proud to support innovative and impactful nursing research
Quantitative research This article describes the basic tenets of quantitative research. The concepts of dependent and independent variables are addressed and the concept of measurement and its associated issues, such as error, reliability and validity, are explored. Experiments and surveys – the principal research design …
This journal includes nursing research and has some quantitative studies. AJN, American Journal of Nursing Increasing Access to Diabetes Education in Rural Alabama Through Telehealth Evaluating the Impact of Smartphones on Nursing Workflow: Lessons Learned
A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation If properly implemented, nursing bedside report can result in improved patient and nursing satisfaction and patient safety outcomes.
Nursing Research covers key issues, including health promotion, human responses to illness, acute care nursing research, symptom management, cost-effectiveness, vulnerable populations, health services, and community-based nursing studies.
Designing a study includes developing good research question(s), choosing an appropriate methodology, estimating sample size, selecting data collection tools, and creating an analysis plan. UCalgary's Research Computing Services is available to help researchers with study design, interpretation of results, and writing up results for publication.